29 Aug – Highway To The Lie Zone

We re-watched Top Gun for like the 50th time the other night, mainly because we were bored but also, who doesn’t love themselves a bit of shirtless Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer on the beach (while Anthony Edwards, wisely, keeps his on).

As a result, we have that bit of Kenny Loggins genius in our head and decided to use it as our title today. But, it’s not a completely irrelevant reference, PZ Myers has turned on the jets of his lies of late. He just crossed the 100-lie threshold and he shows no sign of stopping, while simultaneously hitting the brakes on any science content. That’s a recipe for more frequent lies than the 1.1 a day rate he’s maintained since the 30th of May.

We’ll see how long it takes for him to get to 200. Before Thanksgiving, perhaps?

PZ Myers Lie [in bold]:

Over in that imperialist undemocratic monarchy across the Atlantic (we can be smug because we got rid of the “monarchy” part), people are wondering how the country got to the point that democracy can be suspended by a buffoon.



We dismantled a kissing-cousin of this lie yesterday. PZ seems to think the British Prime Minister can suspend democracy in that country. That’s an interesting claim. We wonder if the Queen is powerless to prevent this from happening. If so, then what’s the point of having a Queen?

In truth, democracy has not been suspended in the UK. The democratic process, as far as Brexit is concerned, has already taken place. The referendum was held three years ago, with the Leavers emerging victorious. And just last year, the British Parliament passed the UK Withdrawal Act, which has been amended twice, extending the exit day, to manage the withdrawal.

The move by Boris Johnson is a parliamentary procedure which has been used in the UK before, most recently 22 years ago by John Major, with the aim of upholding the democratic votes which have already taken place. Once again, PZ isn’t only lying, he’s inverting the truth of this move. Democracy isn’t being suspended, it’s being served in the UK.


This is how partisan political polemicists write, not how a sceptical scientist who uses truth and reason as his guide would write. There are so many things wrong with PZ’s analysis, it’s hard to know where to end. Who listens to someone who argues like this? Who finds this persuasive?

Exactly no one, we suspect.

PZ Myers Lie #2 [in bold]:

There were other irregularities there, too. Let’s not forget the open dishonesty of gerrymandering, either.
It’s funny how the Republicans are fanatical about accusing Democratic voters of fraud and cheating, but they don’t want to fix these basic, obvious problems. It’s almost as if the accusations are a distraction to keep the electorate from noticing how blatantly they are cheating to stay in power.



The title of this post is “Paper ballots everywhere,” and PZ is writing about alleged election irregularities in the last statewide election in Georgia. This is one of many areas where we are in agreement with PZ Myers.

Many on the conservative side of the aisle pine for paper ballots as well. Here is a summary of just one conservative/libertarian site saying many the same things about paper ballots that PZ does here.

But the lies in this snippet focus on two other claims. The first is that only Republicans use gerrymandering to influence the outcome of statewide elections. That is false. Both political parties have used gerrymandering in the past to influence politics in their state. It is a Republican problem, but it’s a Democratic problem as well.

The second lie is the claim that Republicans are “blatantly” cheating in Georgia and elsewhere to gain and maintain power. PZ offers scant evidence of cheating in the post, and no evidence that if indeed cheating did occur it was blatant.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution article PZ links to substantiate this claim says this:

The potential voting irregularities were included among 15,500 pages of documents obtained by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that have also been turned over to the U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee, which is looking into Georgia’s elections. The documents, provided under the Georgia Open Records Act, offer details of alleged voting irregularities but no answers.


It’s hard to be “blatant” when over 15,000 pages of documents provide no answers.


This is another entirely partisan issue for PZ. He was not at all concerned about voting irregularities when Al Franken was elected to the Senate from Minnesota. And he’s not concerned with partisan gerrymandering in Illinois, to name just one example, because it favors his own progressive tribe.

PZ Myers Lie #3 [in bold]:

It was a sudden, violent act, but there’d been obvious signs and multiple warnings that this guy was going to snap. She survived, with serious scarring and pain, and she sued the Army for needlessly putting her life in danger. Guess what happened next? They have a rule that says the military can’t be sued!



The United States Army most decidedly does not have a rule saying they can’t be sued. If PZ had read a little further down the page of the article he cites, he would have found this:

On April 18, 2019, the Army denied Blanchard’s claim for damages, citing the Feres Doctrine — a 1950 Supreme Court precedent which bars service members and their families from suing the military for injury or death brought on by their service. 


The Supreme Court held, unanimously in that case, the following:

The United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to members of the armed forces sustained while on active duty and not on furlough and resulting from the negligence of others in the armed forces.


1LT Katie Blanchard, the military officer in question in this case, has said she will fight to reform the doctrine, which we take to mean a willingness to either bring this case before the Supreme Court again or force Congress to enact changes to the Federal Tort Claims Act. We wish her well in that endeavour, but the sheer difficulty of the fight she has ahead of her underscores the magnitude of PZ’s lie. This isn’t a “rule” that can be changed on a whim. This is well-established law that was decided unanimously by the highest court in the land.


All of this information was available to PZ Myers if he had taken the time to look for it. But, when he has a point to make, he can’t let silly things like facts get in the way.

He is so well entrenched in the lie-zone – yes, we’ve still got Kenny in our head – it’s difficult for us to see a path for him back to the truth. What would he write about if he refrained from lying about politics every day?


Nah…he wouldn’t do that.

Final Tally:

Today: 0 science-related posts, 4 posts on other stuff

Since 30 May 19: 90 science-related posts, 299 non-science posts.

23% of the posts on a “science blog” are about science. 

Today: 3 PZ Myers Lies

Since 30 May 19: 105 PZ Myers Lies

Over to you, PZ. Until tomorrow.

24 July – Another Lie, Or Is It a Satire of a Lie?

PZ Myers was prolific today. Over the course of eight total posts he provided some interesting spider content, railed (and lied) about Trump being a racist (a lie we no longer count) and wrote one of the most confusing posts we’ve ever read, leading to the lie below.

Is it satire? Is PZ trying to go all meta on us?

PZ Myers Lie [in bold]:

Oh. My. God. [Quillette] published a piece praising Boris Johnson that, I swear, reads like something from The Onion or McSweeney’s…Which now makes me wonder…is this entire article by Toby Young, with all its hyperbole and bizarre imagery, also intended to be satire? Is it mocking Boris or praising him effusively? It’s impossible to tell. 



We don’t often use ellipsis to join quotations spanning entire blog posts, but we felt it was justified here. PZ claims in the first bolded sentence that Quillette praised Boris Johnson, but in the final sentence is says it’s “impossible to tell.”

In point of fact, it is possible to tell: Toby Young, who has had a personal relationship with Boris Johnson going back decades, both mocks and praises him. It is a nuanced piece which explains both Johnson’s appeal as well as his ability to enrage his opponents, of which PZ Myers is definitely in the latter category.


This post wasn’t very long, but PZ managed to contradict himself anyway within the span of just a few paragraphs. We think he might have been trying out a bit of satire, given that’s what he (unsuccessfully) tried to claim was happening in the Quillette piece. Whatever he was trying to do, he managed to turn it into a lie, as he often does.

Final Tally:

Today: 3 science-related posts, 5 posts on other stuff

Since 30 May 19: 64 science-related posts, 160 non-science posts.

28% of the posts on a “science blog” are about science. 

Today: 1 PZ Myers Lie

Since 30 May 19: 69 PZ Myers Lies

Over to you, PZ. Until tomorrow.